bullet

UN Committee Against Torture Found ´Numerous, Ongoing and Consistent Allegations´ of Torture and Ill-treatment by Israeli Interrogators, in particular, against Palestinians

bullet

Physicians for Human Rights-Israel and Kayan-Feminist Organization, in a joint petition to HCJ: The state of Israel denies medical care to victims of domestic violence

bullet

Collapse of Israeli-Palestinian Coordination Mechanism for Referrals of Patients for Medical Treatment outside Gaza

bullet

Update: End of Gaza Patients Referral Crisis

bullet

Shooting at medical personnel - testimonies from Gaza

See website of Physicians for Human Rights - Israel:  http://phr.org.il/phr/

 

   

 

  Text Box: Read the following references from Physicians for Human Rights - Israel
 
 
 
UN Committee Against Torture Found ´Numerous, Ongoing and Consistent Allegations´ of Torture and Ill-treatment by Israeli Interrogators, in particular, against Palestinians
Physicians for Human Rights-Israel and Kayan-Feminist Organization, in a joint petition to HCJ: The state of Israel denies medical care to victims of domestic violence
Collapse of Israeli-Palestinian Coordination Mechanism for Referrals of Patients for Medical Treatment outside Gaza
Update: End of Gaza Patients Referral Crisis
Shooting at medical personnel - testimonies from Gaza
See website of Physicians for Human Rights - Israel:  http://phr.org.il/phr/ 
 
    
 
 
Folded Corner: Call for boycott against the Israel Medical Association 
Statement
Palestinian Medical and Health Institutions Call for Imposing Measures against the Israel Medical Association (IMA)

Whereas the IMA's medical ethics record on torture has been well documented, and the institution has never denounced or seriously confronted the Israeli government on its shameless use of torture;

Whereas the IMA has shown blatant disregard for the ethical issue of medical neutrality, with the IMA unconditionally defending the violations of medical neutrality by the Israeli army in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT);
Whereas the IMA is charged with being the executive arm of the Israeli establishment working to support political imperatives rather than serving universal medical ethics;
Whereas the IMA violates it own Physicians' Code of Ethics, which stipulates that the goal of the IMA is to: "... maintain a suitable professional and ethical level in the medical profession";

Whereas the IMA has either contributed directly to maintaining, defending, or justifying oppression and wars, or has stood silently in the face of civilian deaths in the OPT and Lebanon; the killing, harassment and wounding of Palestinian and Lebanese health professionals on duty; and the destruction of the Palestinian and Lebanese health systems -- in the OPT as a result of destruction of the infrastructure, the apartheid Wall, and in Lebanon as a result of the massive destruction of infrastructure, roads, bridges and petrol outlets-- all systematic violations of the Fourth Geneva Convention;.....

In the spirit of international solidarity, moral consistency and resistance to injustice and oppression,

We, the undersigned, Palestinian Medical and Health institutions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, call on world medical and health institutions to:

1. Immediately end cooperation with, and refrain from participation in, any form of collaboration or joint activities with the IMA.

2. Advocate for the condemnation of the IMA.

3. Support Palestinian medical and health institutions directly without requiring them to partner with Israeli counterparts as a condition for such support.

The Medical Association -Jerusalem (Palestinian Physician's Union); Maqassed Hospital - Jerusalem; Red Crescent Society - Gaza; The Gaza Community Mental Health Program; Arab Women's Union Hospital - Nablus; Union of Palestinian Medical Relief Committees - West Bank and Gaza (Palestinian Medical Relief Society); Health Work Committees; Union of Health Work Committees - Gaza; Union of Health Care Committees; The National Society for Rehabilitation - Gaza; Near East Council of Churches Committee for Refugees - Gaza; Union of Agricultural Work Committees; Treatment and Rehabilitation Center for the Victims of Torture (TRC); Patients Friends Society - Jenin; Union of Palestinian Handicapped; Palestinian Family Planning and Protection Association; Health Policy Forum; Project Loving Care - Jerusalem; Palestinian National Institute for NGO's.

Related Links
·  Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
·  BY TOPIC: Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions 
 
To read/download the FULL  STATEMENT, CLICK HERE

          

 

 

2008/11/25

UAT report: Torture and ill-treatment in Israel and the oPt

In its 2008 Annual Report, the United Against Torture Coalition (UAT Coalition), a coalition of 14 Palestinian and Israeli human rights organisations, has undertaken an in-depth and critical analysis of Israel's compliance with the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT).

The report examines the continued and systemic use of torture by the State of Israel, in both Israel and in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt).

In accordance with the mandate of the UAT Coalition, the Annual Report focuses on violations against Palestinians, in both the oPt and Israel. The Annual Report is based on material submitted by the UAT Coalition to the United Nations Committee against Torture (the Committee) in September 2008, pending the Committee's periodical review of Israel's compliance with CAT, scheduled for May 2009.

The Annual Report draws upon the considerable experience of the UAT Coalition membership including more than 80 pages of affidavit material, extracts of which are interspersed throughout.

In preparing the Annual Report, the UAT Coalition examined the use of torture and ill-treatment by the Israeli authorities against Palestinians from the point of arrest, through interrogation and detention as well as the use of coerced confessions in the military courts. The Annual Report also considers:

bullet The use of torture and ill-treatment in non-conventional circumstances, including house demolitions, the Gaza siege and the coercion by the Israeli Security Agency (ISA) of medical patients attempting to exit Gaza in order to access necessary medical treatment. 
bullet The continued use of incommunicado detention and lack of prompt access to lawyers for Palestinians detainees. 
bullet The discriminatory nature in which laws and practices are applied to Palestinian detainees compared to Israeli citizens. 
bullet The impunity with which ISA interrogators, police officers and members of the Israeli army torture and abuse Palestinian detainees, including children as young as 12. 
bullet A legislative exemption that allows the ISA to interrogate Palestinian detainees without audio visual recordings as is required in other investigations. 
bullet The failure of the State of Israel to clearly prohibit the use of torture and ill-treatment in its domestic legislation as recommended by the UN Committee.

The UAT Coalition concludes in its Annual Report that the use of torture and ill-treatment by Israeli authorities against Palestinians is both widespread and systematic. The State is either unwilling or unable to fulfill its treaty obligations under CAT.

The UAT Coalition has observed and recorded evidence of acts, omissions and complicity by agents of the State at all levels, including the army, the intelligence service, the police, the judiciary and other branches of government. The UAT Coalition is of the view that until this culture of impunity is addressed the situation is unlikely to improve.

Contact a DCI-Palestine if you wish to receive a hard copy of the report or read it online in English, Arabic or Hebrew.

Source: UAT

 

 

Let us not forget the 410 of our innocent children massacred by the Zionist army . WHY ? They could not offer resistance with sophisticated weapons nor did the zionist doctors have to dirty their hands to help them and their parents! Please view these pictures and judge.  WARNING:  viewing NOT for the sensitive. Click on zionist massacres

 

 

    

                                               

                                                               Click here to download FULL Bulletin

 

 

 

 

 

 

Text Box: Dr Derek Summerfield responds to Prof Nathanson’s (Chairperson of British Medical Association) deliberate refusal to act on criticism of Dr Blachar and the Israeli Medical Association (IMA)
18th July 2009
 Dear Professor Nathanson,
I’m sorry that you haven’t felt able to respond to my appeal to you of a few weeks back.  Whilst I am not currently a BMA member, I am unsure what would change if I was: you or your committee seem to have taken a decision several years ago not to reply to any letter from me. Isn’t that a bit strange?
As before, the reflections below are not directed to you personally, but to your post and Committee (indeed for all I know, you have your own thoughts on this situation, but are mandated to defend an agreed BMA line).
One of the signatories to our open letter of appeal to the WMA Council has shown me your reply dated 13th July to his second letter to you.  I would like to make a few brief comments on this.  
You say that this conflict is of a “complex nature” and that there is “the difficulty it presents to those who wish to approach it constructively and even-handedly”. You add that the issue is “riven by claims and counter-claims” and that critics have used “extremely broad brushes”.  
The mass of documentary evidence in the public realm regarding torture and the institutionalised collaboration of doctors in Israel all points the same way: what is “complex” about that?
To be clear, the case we make is based on the findings of a range of regional and international human rights organisations over the last fifteen years or so:  Amnesty (no less than 11 of their reports 2002-7 have the word ‘torture’ in the title), Human Rights Watch, UN Committee Against Torture, Israeli organisations like Physicians for Human Rights (PHRI) and the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI), Palestinian organisations like the Palestinian Environmental NGOs Network and the Health, Development, Information and Policy Institute. Does the BMA see these organisations as having used “extremely broad brushes”, or doubts that they have approached the problem “constructively and even-handedly?”  Is this body of evidence, in an era of evidence based medicine, reducible to the status of mere “claim”? Only 2 weeks ago Dr Ishai Menuchin, Executive Director of PCATI, was in the Israeli press lambasting the IMA about doctors and torture: the 2007 PCATI report “Ticking Bombs”, based on detailed testimony from 9 Palestinian men, gave a devastating account of the entirely everyday involvement of doctors in interrogation suites whose output is torture, naming names etc.
What of the “counter-claims” to which you refer?  Dr Blachar has been repeatedly quoted in the media as totally rejecting the evidence we present, blaming me as some sort of irrational obsessive, discounting the physician signatories with Arab names in a racist-sounding way, and openly criticising PHRI as encouraging a climate of anti-Israeli criticism, boycott etc (as a medical human rights organisation, PHRI are in my opinion currently unsurpassed in the energy and quality of their humanitarian advocacy). These crude and cynical responses are entirely consistent with the way that over many years the Blachar IMA has ignored, deflected and vilified those who made appeals to them re torture/Fourth Geneva Convention violations etc., or who published the evidence in medical journals. Dr Blachar treats Amnesty findings as if they didn’t exist.  This has been an active policy, pursued with eyes open: we are not accusing Blachar of being supine!  What body of evidence can Blachar produce to support his “counter-claim” that the IMA is ethical and conforms to the WMA codes to which the IMA is signed up? 
You will recall our exchanges in the BMJ in September 2003 on this subject (1) (2). In response to my letter of appeal to the BMA, you wrote that allegations of violations of medical neutrality did need investigation by an independent expert body “but the problem is to identify by whom”. As I noted in the follow-up correspondence in November, I found this astonishing.  Was Amnesty not already such a body, and the other organisations whose findings were cited? (3) At the same time you defended the BMA’s collegiate relationship with the IMA, and said that the BMA favoured “education”.  Does the IMA, a WMA member, lack medical ethics “education?”  What conclusions are human rights campaigners to draw from all this, other than what most immediately spring to mind?
You say that for the BMA to make a public call you would need to do so on the basis of “strong evidence”. If in the view of your Committee all the evidence against the IMA does not constitute a rock-solid basis for action in defence of medical ethics, no evidence ever will.
To read / download the full letter: click on: Letter to Prof Nathanson BMA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let us not forget the 410 of our innocent children massacred by the Zionist army . WHY ? They could not offer resistance with

sophisticated weapons nor did the zionist doctors have to dirty their hands to help them and their parents! Please view these pictures and judge. 

WARNING:  viewing NOT for the sensitive. Click on zionist massacres

Text Box: BC News in UK is highlighting a report just produced b Physicians for Human Rights Israel (phr.org.il), an excellent and highly active nongovernmental organisation, about the continuing, indeed increasing use by Israel of coercive and intimidating interrogations of those who have applied to leave Gaza for medical treatment-frequently a matter of life or death.
They cite at least 438 patients interrogated like this-including children. Interrogators threaten and do block exit, even for those who have gone through the exhausting process of applying for a permit, if they are not satified with the answers given. Some patients were detained for undisclosed periods of time on this basis. This continues a pattern that PHR Israel were documenting last year, and could hardly be more grossly dehumanising and morally repugnant. These are medical ethical violations of rights guaranteed by the Fourth Geneva Convention, yet as ever the Israeli Med assoc stays silent. For that matter so do the World Med Assoc- with IMA President Blachar as WMA President!
 
STOP     Zionist efforts to take over 
World Medical Associations Council